tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34336887.post3893620557872258371..comments2024-01-10T18:02:27.468-06:00Comments on Reform Dem: McCain and the Environment - Historical LCV RatingsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34336887.post-63903438001587451642008-04-21T09:48:00.000-05:002008-04-21T09:48:00.000-05:00You know, Proletariat, that's pretty much the same...You know, Proletariat, that's pretty much the same attitude Greens had towards Bush in 2000. Ignore the huge differences between the Republican and the Democrat because the Dem isn't pure enough. And just look how well that worked out...Russellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14409405491391904845noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-34336887.post-34773931199398896492008-04-08T05:50:00.000-05:002008-04-08T05:50:00.000-05:00Russell,Yes, certainly Clinton and Obama have bett...Russell,<BR/><BR/>Yes, certainly Clinton and Obama have better records than McCain. With that said McCain has received their endorsement in the past, and certainly one could argue a McCain would get more bang for the buck. <BR/><BR/>If global warming is an issue a McCain bringing a party closer to your positions may in fact be better than either Dems. <BR/><BR/>Now if I was going to wage a bet on moving forward on global warming, I would have to go with McCain. Both Dems while sounding good are accepting large amounts of money from oil and energy companies. <BR/><BR/>This is most likely what happened with Obama with the 2005 Energy Bill. While his inclination was for clearer energy (and I don't mean coal) it was pay back time for his senate seat. After 2005, his record more closely aligns Hillary's positions.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com