I've been actively opposed to the Iraq war since before it started, although more so in the first couple of years. One of the big reasons that political opposition to the war has never gelled sufficiently to stop it is illustrated by the graphic below from a new USA Today/Gallop poll. While only 40% of Americans fully support the war, opponents have fundimental disagreements on how to actually end it. This has crippled the antiwar effort, and as a result Bush has been able to forestall all attempts to get us out of Iraq.
(Click on image for a clearer version)
The take-home lesson here is that unity is power in politics. A minority can always control the majority if the minority is united and the majority isn't. Unfortunately, achieving a united majority usually requires compromise, something a big part of the active left, including me at times, have a problem with.
Thursday, March 13, 2008
Sunday, March 09, 2008
Why County Board Elections Matter - Environmental Issues
It's easy to overlook the importance of the Dane County Board, and County Board elections, when we think about politics here in the Madison area. But the Board determines environmental, land use, and human services policy for the entire county, including Madison. As these ratings show, there's an enormous difference in the way liberal and conservative County Board members vote on environmental issues and land use.
The first chart shows ratings for every County Board Supervisor based on their votes since August 2006. I've grouped the liberal Supervisors (in blue) and the conservative Supervisors (in red) so you can see the rather astonishing contrast. The average score is 90% for liberals verses less than 20% for conservatives. Click on the charts for larger versions.
The full environmental voting record of each supervisor is shown below, followed by info on each of the votes used in the ratings.
Notes:
1. Due to his voting record I listed Richard Brown as a conservative despite the fact that he was endorsed by the Democratic Party in his last run. The Dem Party actually endorsed Lisa Subeck against him this time around, and Brown was eliminated in the primary.
2. I ignored absences and abstentions when I calculated the percentage ratings, although all absences and abstentions are shown in the vote record above. Some County Board members miss a heck of a lot of meetings, so I encourage you to check out their individual voting records.
3. Although I did the ratings and made the charts, I didn't compile the actual vote data. Many thanks to my co-conspirator who did most of the hard work to make this post possible.
4. I apologize for using images rather than tables, but blogger has a hard time dealing with anything other than very simple tables.
5. I'll cover County Board votes on other issues in a future post. Watch for it...
The first chart shows ratings for every County Board Supervisor based on their votes since August 2006. I've grouped the liberal Supervisors (in blue) and the conservative Supervisors (in red) so you can see the rather astonishing contrast. The average score is 90% for liberals verses less than 20% for conservatives. Click on the charts for larger versions.
The full environmental voting record of each supervisor is shown below, followed by info on each of the votes used in the ratings.
Vote # | Date | Minutes Page | Item | Significance |
1 | 8/17/2006 | 108-109 | Res. 73 | Purchase of conservation land - Dunn, Pleasant Springs. |
2 | 9/21/2006 | 147-148 | Res. 102 | Delay action on purchase of land next to Brigham Park. |
3 | 9/21/2006 | 150-151 | Res. 103 | Independent study on power lines. |
4 | 11/15/2006 | 193 | Budget | Cut conservation fund from $5 million to $1 million. |
5 | 2/1/2007 | 269 | Petition 9335 | Zoning change to permit development adjacent to Military Ridge Trail. |
6 | 2/1/2007 | 270 | Petition 9632 | Re-refer loosening zoning restrictions - Blue Mounds |
7 | 3/1/2007 | 294-320 | Ord. Am. 26 | Loosen floodplain restrictions. (Sub. 2). |
8 | 4/5/2007 | 371-372 | Ord. Am. 34 | Delay effective date of Coal tar sealcoat restrictions. |
9 | 5/2/2007 | 26-28 | Res. 290 | Delay action on Bio-Ag, Town of Dunn. |
10 | 8/16/2007 | 107 | Petition 9721 | Zoning change to permit construction - Vermont. |
11 | 8/16/2007 | 114-116 | Res. 57 Sub. 2 | RTA - Adoption of Res. 57 Sub. 2. |
12 | 9/6/2007 | 134-135 | Petition 9611 | Zoning change to permit construction - Vermont. |
13 | 9/20/2007 | 146-147 | Petition 9474 | Re-refer zoning change to permit development - Springfield. |
14 | 9/20/2007 | 155-157 | Res. 94 | Motion to cut Conservation Fund. |
15 | 11/1/2007 | 207-209 | Res. 127 | Delay action on Saddlebrook purchase. |
16 | 12/6/2008 | 244 | Petition 9474 | Zoning change to permit development - Springfield. |
17 | 12/20/2008 | 271-274 | Ord. Am. 26 | Postpone action on Transfer of Development Rights (TDR). |
Notes:
1. Due to his voting record I listed Richard Brown as a conservative despite the fact that he was endorsed by the Democratic Party in his last run. The Dem Party actually endorsed Lisa Subeck against him this time around, and Brown was eliminated in the primary.
2. I ignored absences and abstentions when I calculated the percentage ratings, although all absences and abstentions are shown in the vote record above. Some County Board members miss a heck of a lot of meetings, so I encourage you to check out their individual voting records.
3. Although I did the ratings and made the charts, I didn't compile the actual vote data. Many thanks to my co-conspirator who did most of the hard work to make this post possible.
4. I apologize for using images rather than tables, but blogger has a hard time dealing with anything other than very simple tables.
5. I'll cover County Board votes on other issues in a future post. Watch for it...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)